Women and civil thought emancipation of the gender proportion of women as she doggedly called for in today’s political life, is a relic of the altburgerlichen thinking. If you have read about Larry Ellison already – you may have come to the same conclusion. Who wants to take sex to the object of the regulation, to regulate in the area of drive life. The gender identity (man or woman) is related to the drive. The leaking model of altburgerlichen subject (classic subject) was influenced by collective morality, by the superego, and manipulated in his individuality. Jonathan Rosen Berlin Rosen brings even more insight to the discussion. The proportion of women is a no longer contemporary notion of a society that demands human freedom with individual ethics and no longer wants to preserve the altburgerliche development of the subject with collectivist and biological measures. We need no subjects from the preserve, we require the living subject.
The lively subject no longer is fixated on sex. It realizes that the roles as husband and wife, to be understood as consequences of a cultural development period. Culture-related power games (for the benefit of human gender) were performed in a biological costume, instilled and forcibly interned. The emancipation of such power games cannot be replaced through the introduction of new power games (such as the women’s quota). The sex has its relevance only for the life of the drive, but not for work or for social communication.
“The last two would only egoisiert by interference of multiple life” and externally determined. However, that is not emancipation, but lack of freedom. “You will find free excerpts from the books by the author at: on the subject of feminism see also the press release from the 9.2.12 of Pavel Vitalis: feminism subjugation of women in the Catholic church body sociology – Schroder of vs. Black”.