Professor

Moreover, the military power of the Ocidente was not more seen as a counterbalance to the Soviet power, but seen as a force to keep. to keep what, accurately? North to one determined line, says to keep the peace and the stability in the world for the force necessity, in the south of this line that surrounds the land, passing particularly the Strait of Gibraltar and throughout the Rio Grande, says, to keep the peace alone will be necessary for the force, the supremacy of the Ocidente. This long horizontal defeat, asking, if it will be widened irremediably, or then she can still be scrumbled, to invert itself, so that if she starts to construct bridges? Being able to also have one another possibility to become fullfilled itself inside of the European context, for that they will not be capable of if carrying through throughout centuries, the global level, namely: To show for example that the Ocidente is made use to apply for the others the principles, that it decreed for itself, so that it can recoup its moral credibility. This moral credibility is, in the world of today, the merchandise rarest. The Ocidente has each time less, ahead of its opponents who do not have. To try to restore its moral credibility on all the planet could be a difficult task, without being reasonable to try to restore it nas our societies and where the diversity in disappearence way is the only place.

For this, we must make of form that those that they had opted to living in occidental countries can be identified fully, with its society of adoption, perantes its institutions, its values, its language, and even though its history. They are not constantly citizens the vieses of discrimination and the culture. That they can reveal with raised head and pluralista identity instead of being forced to an agonizing choice and nefaste between its native culture and adopted culture. Being able, finally, to play its role as passarela of civilization and whitewashing of its society of origin to the eyes of the Ocidente, as well as if considering as a way capable to rehabilitate the proper Ocidente. Therefore the attempt to withdraw for a ortaleza can be understandable in this context, especially at a moment where the perigos are great and where the necessity of if protecting are real.

But me it seems that it is exactly in this dangerous crossroads of the history that would have to consider to all the peoples of the Europe and the populations of other places, a new social contract, a contract of coexistence that allows to cure, little by little, the wounds of the time. That is what the modern Europe has made for its proper wounds, and this is what it can and it must make today in our disoriented humanity. No action that me seems to be more important. Nor most urgent, because already it is almost late excessively. Lahcen EL MOUTAQI Professor of the University Mohammed V-Morocco