Parents at the network e. V., vehemently opposes the planned amendment of the youth media protection state contract (JMStV). Reason: From our point of view is the amendment to a disabled attempting to suggest apparent security in the network by the State. But the fact is that already the first attempt at the so-called anti-child pornography law is miserably. With a huge media effort and transparent polls, the law before the last federal election was whipped and put on hold after the election by the legislative procedure. At the moment all parties argue, whether that stop “is sign an effective protection against child pornography or not. The fact is also that the law so far convincing little.

And now the second attempt: all providers should take their network offers of an age rating and if provided with appropriate protection mechanisms, so that children and young people, for which this content should not be accessible, also cannot make use of these. What should that look like in practice? First, the provider should take their offerings of even an age classification. Gorgeous! And who controls this self-assessment and under what criteria? Times a small example: imagine for a moment, in an elementary school teaching of sexual education would take place child-friendly and gentle. We accept this school would have a blog or a forum and a student writes a short report about these lessons. How many concerned parents would demand storm running and an age restriction against this content? Now at least as many parents who forbid their children participate in this lesson. “So: what is now age” or harmful to minors? Also, all bloggers, private providers and clubs to identify their content.

So far so good. What will become of the many small providers, who prepare content with much effort and domestic work. “That cost very much money, brings the editors except honor” anything. These are now a Not Acceptable!

Not Acceptable!

An appropriate representation of the requested resource could not be found on this server. This error was generated by Mod_Security.

Internet. Prerequisite for this is that media literacy be promoted and not cropped at all ages. Man should be an independently thinking and acting individual Yes. Then, he should have the possibility to develop. Stop-sign such actions”are not helpful but contra-productive. And in the case a little to document the justified anger parents network exclude the IP currently 147 groups of Governments, ministries, offices and parties by the website in the next few days and also point to a stop sign, which stop.htmlbereits advance can be seen here. Background parents on the network e. V. parents in the network e. V. was founded in February 2008. Aim of the Association is to empower parents to support the computer and Internet activities of their children or to restrict and to familiarise them with the Internet tools and services. This includes parents, know what dangers on the kids on the Internet can and how they can protect their children. And of course parents can go to itself with Internet and computer. This runs the association with Internet platform, regularly conducts briefings and offering parents classes. Parents on the network is a project of the Cyspro Media Group: parents on the network E.v. contact: Andre Kind and Viola Genz Yorckstrasse 39 04159 Leipzig Tel: 0341 5904166 E-Mail: