Curitiba, 04 of May of the 2011 (Wednesday) controversy on the new Forest code, for Henry Pack The Brazilian, regulating constitutional emendation from the deforestation and agrarian use suffers quarrel in the congress for the afrouxamento of the Brazilian forest regulation, becoming possible its feasibility. In Brazil, more than 90% of the Brazilian agricultural producers possess legal pendencies. A quarrel that if extends since 2008 tends to flexibilizar the mechanisms of proteco and ambient conservation. After all, a utopian law is a good law? The new ambient code must solve empasses generated by the economic growth and the consequent devastao in the 5,2 million country properties spread by 38% of the State. With it, the Law of Ambient Crimes and the size of the APA will be defined, that includes the APP and the RL. The controversial project, must guarantee the length of the law, in parents of ' ' democracy recente' ' (managing Greenpeace Brazil, in exclusive news article to the JN). Between what this in guideline, cites the size of APPs, fragile places where it can occur erosions, landslides and floods, in the areas of hillsides of mounts and sides of rivers.

Its computation will have also to be defined as RL. The new law can harm the exportation of agricultural commodites, marked for the strong economic importance; Brazil is the producing and exporting greater of coffee, soy, cotton, sugar, bovine meat and orange juice – headquarters of biggest planetary biodiversity. It fits to stand out that only countries as Uruguay and Brazil possesss RL areas. ONGs defending of the Brazilian natural resources, little makes in other countries, as U.S.A. After all, this country more produces 4 times the amount of grains of that one, while its liberal laws on natural conservation have not been argued for ambientalistas. The Brazilian constitution of 1988 guarantees that ' ' all the Brazilian has right to an environment saudvel.' ' From 1965, the government implants measures that would guarantee the natural preservation in private properties and the punishment of the respective proprietors, considering the land as of common interest to all the citizens.